Alternative
distribution Channels
Telia launches new distribution channel
for mobile telephony
2003-08-20 14:02
Telia has started to co-operate with the company
Retail and Brands to sell mobile telephony services in a newly opened
clothing department called "NK B-Tween" at the NK department
store building in downtown Stockholm. Telia is the first operator
in Sweden, and probably in Europe, to sell mobile telephones and
services together with fashion apparel.
Retail and Brands has 121 retail outlets in Sweden
and owns the store concepts SOLO, Champagne, Polarn O. Pyret, Blombergs
and Saks. Retail and Brands is also one of the major companies selling
apparel at the NK department store building in Stockholm.
Alternative distribution channels are new strategy
The first department combining fashion apparel and mobile telephony
services, NK B-Tween, targets a young group of consumers. The department
sells mobile telephones from Nokia, Sony Ericsson and Siemens -
all with Telia subscriptions - and fashion clothing from the labels
Nudie, Puma, We, Energie, Killah, Miss Sixty, Diesel, Fornarina
and Svea.
"Clothing and mobile telephones are on the
wish-lists of many young people and the new department at NK gives
us the opportunity to package these products in an attractive way,"
says Indra Åsander, head of the Consumer Segment at TeliaSonera
Sweden.
"Mobile and Nudie jeans at a special price"
The business model allows new types of sales offers that will be
marketed to consumers in campaigns featuring both mobile handsets
and clothing. For example, NK B-Tween will be the only outlet selling
Siemen?s new designer telephone Xelibri.
"This is a new way to sell clothes and mobile
phones. I am convinced it will contribute to enhancing the experience
for our customers and also benefit both our industries," says
Mikael Solberg, CEO, Retail and Brands.
All store personnel at NK B-Tween have been trained
in the mobile phones and services that are for sale at the department.
Each employee is also equipped with a camera phone. If they receive
permission, the phone can be used to photograph customers wearing
different creations. The photos are then shown on plasma screens
on site in the department and on the website www.stilikon.se, which
is being launched at the same time as the department. With MMS messages,
customers can also send photos of themselves in different fashion
garments to friends and acquaintances in order to get their opinion
about the clothes they are considering to buy.
Year of change
Jan 6, 2005
For the past four years the UK mobile market has
been dominated by four operators sharing the market amongst themselves,
making it difficult for customers to distinguish between them.
In fact, it would not come as a surprise if the
majority of British mobile users couldn’t explain the difference
between Orange, Vodafone, T-Mobile and O2, despite the networks’
attempts to counter this. But this is set to change.
Today customers primarily buy new mobiles bundled
with either prepay or contract connections. Subscribers’ main
focus has historically been on the mobile handsets and voice minute
prices; SMS prices have also been important, but do not usually
influence their choice of operator. In 2005, the mobile market will
mainly be influenced by:
-
3G services from Vodafone, Orange, T-Mobile
and O2
-
MVNOs with Sim-only concepts
-
Falling voice/SMS prices, especially in prepay
-
The end of prepay handset subsidies
High mobile penetration in the UK, combined with
other factors, will lead to a market where differences between various
players will become more apparent within 12 months. The UK market
will change more in 2005 than it has over the past three years.
Consumers take power
2005 will be remembered as the year consumers wrested power from
operators. In past years, operators could offer good deals in partnership
with retailers, attracting the customers they needed to maintain
market share and compensate for the ever-present churn flourishing
in a competitive market. Customers will take power by demanding
simple tariffs, no monthly subscriptions and fixed-rate, cross-network
pricing. Voice and SMS prices will become more important than any
new and/or smart mobile handsets.
Many people will be taken by surprise at just how
fast the mobile market will change, as customers start going for
the offerings that give them the most value for money.
In 2005, unlocking handsets will become a national
pastime despite the industry’s best efforts to stop it: the
press, consumer organisations and even politicians will defend customers’
desire to unlock their mobiles.
-
Voice and SMS pricing will drive rapid changes in the market
-
Unlocking will become endemic
The operators
Vodafone and Orange’s 3G launches will in many ways be similar
to what we’ve already seen from 3. There is little left that
3 has not already said, so for many new customers switching to 3G,
choosing between Vodafone, Orange or 3 will come down to what handsets
they offer and how many voice minutes will be bundled in 3G tariffs.
Vodafone will most likely position itself as the
3G business provider, focusing on how businesses could benefit from
3G connections to corporate applications. Its strong selling point
is that it can support this approach with the promise of European-wide
roaming between its many networks.
Orange will be similar to 3, but with an already
established brand to help. Orange will charge higher prices for
3G services than 3, while at the same time becoming more competitive
with its handset portfolio. There is a good chance this strategy
could see Orange lose UK market share in 2005.
O2 will emerge as the most sensible operator, offering
high-ARPU customers very attractive offerings on both 3G handsets
and tariffs. Its message will be that if customers will be spending
a lot of money on 3G, it will make an offer very hard to refuse.
T-Mobile’s strategy will vary somewhat from
other players’. By 2006, it will undoubtedly be the largest
mobile UK operator in customer numbers. An aggressive MVNO-based
strategy will give T-Mobile, in contrast to rivals, the widest distribution
in the UK with the lowest subscriber acquisition costs (SACs), which
will offset the impact of lower revenues from cheaper MVNO tariffs.
3 will continue large subsidies and low prices,
resulting in a continued growth in its customer base. But 3’s
growth will result in a number of problems or challenges regarding
the quality of customer service, billing, network etc. By 2006,
3 will have a more noticeable share of the UK market, but many will
still question the cost of acquiring that success.
-
T-Mobile will become the largest UK operator
-
Vodafone will aim to lead business 3G
-
3G pricing could cost Orange market share
Not-so-super market
The coming year will see greater fragmentation in UK distribution
as many independent retailers face tougher times, eventually moving
to a market that will primarily sell through four channels:
-
Specialist stores offering multiple operator choices
-
-
Direct online sales of Sim cards
-
Consultants selling to corporate clients
As prices drop, operators will make every effort
to bring down operating expenditures and SACs by reducing workforces,
as T-Mobile is already doing, and changing subsidy and commission
strategies.
Operator subsidies for prepay customers will diminish
or disappear altogether, taking a chunk out of retailers’
earnings. The large mobile retail chains that can add value in different
ways, like The Carphone Warehouse, will have a reasonable year.
Their size and the fact they offer products from multiple operators
will help them maintain good levels of activity.
Smaller chains and operator-owned stores will probably
see reductions in activity and turnover, and non-specialist FMCG
(Fast Moving Consumer Goods) retailers will see a larger decrease
in prepay sales, meaning leaner times for them.
MVNO storm warning
2005 will be the year of the MVNO. T-Mobile will drive this market,
using MVNOs as alternative distribution outlets to consumer and
business customers.
Virgin Mobile, easyMobile and others will grow
T-Mobile’s overall customer base and ensure an ever-increasing
growth of traffic staying within T-Mobile’s own mobile network,
helping to lower its termination charges.
EasyMobile will surprise many in the industry and
the press. The name on everyone’s lips will without a doubt
be easyMobile’s CEO, Frank Rasmussen (pictured). He is a man
who speaks out for, and sides with, the man in the street. In Denmark,
he is loved by customers and the press, while his competitors usually
find him an irritating pain. His message will be simple: cheap mobile
telephony and freedom for the customers, cutting through the mumbo
jumbo of the tariff jungle.
This will lead to serious competition between Virgin
Mobile and easyMobile, most probably with Virgin copying easyMobile’s
online, Sim-only model that made Danish MVNO Telmore world famous
– a model others will emulate.
The MVNOs will become a consumer favourite and
customers not too worried about the latest and smartest mobile phones
will flock from comparatively expensive prepay tariffs to MVNOs’
cheap, internet-based offerings, resulting in a dramatic decrease
in prepay prices and then in contract prices. However, the good
news is that this will lead to an increase in voice and SMS traffic.
-
Virgin and easyMobile will clash
-
Others will copy Sim only, online distribution
Content grows market
Looking at value-added services (VAS), the operators will focus
on their 3G portals, which will mainly be extensions of existing
2.5G portals but with video calls, streaming video and downloads
of music and games.
The 2005 VAS market will be influenced by five
things:
-
New players entering the VAS market
-
More MMS, Wap and Java services
-
Content providers driving demand
-
Tougher regulation of the market
-
More services targeting b2b markets
Some operators might even admit in public that
the VAS they are selling via their open-garden offerings, like premium
SMS services, will be generating much bigger earnings than their
own portals.
ICSTIS will also tighten regulation of premium
VAS, especially with regard to protecting minors, making the marketing
of subscription services another conversation piece in 2005.
Handsets
With handsets, we will see ever-increasing numbers of new mobile
phones, new designs and terminals specifically designed for smaller,
specialised customer segments.Looking at the manufacturers, the
UK market shares will go to:
-
Nokia
-
Samsung
-
Sony Ericsson
-
LG
-
Motorola
-
Siemens
-
HTC
HTC will take many by surprise. T-Mobile, Orange
and O2 will focus on the corporate market, and one of the big conversation
pieces this year will be mobile handsets for business users –
an area HTC knows well from the SPV and Xda devices.
Operators will see increasing numbers of customers
owning two mobile phones, two Sim cards and two separate mobile
subscriptions on different networks. This will not only negatively
affect SACs, but also make an impact on churn. Despite handset manufacturers’
assurances that advanced phones will stimulate higher ARPUs, operators
will have difficulties when customers choose one handset for voice
and another for data, or one handset for work and another for leisure
– both on different networks.
Conclusion: a sea change
All in all, 2005 will be a fast-paced year of significant change.
The result will be a much more fragmented market and increasing
numbers of customers showing different purchasing behaviour.
The new behaviours, combined with falling prices,
will affect the operators, handset suppliers and, of course, the
retail market – and mostly for the worse.
By the end of 2005 there are likely to be significantly
fewer employees in all areas of the UK mobile industry and many
executives will be looking at a job change.
Who profits from service?
Feb 3, 2005
Martin Darby, Vodafone head of retail
Vodafone’s Martin Darby frankly admits that the company’s
new priorities meant it had to ask itself ‘challenging’
questions about whether it was a sales or service-led business.
‘You can’t start thinking about an
incentives policy until you know what’s important and what
your business objectives are,’ he says.
Darby soon found out that staff priorities varied
depending on what the Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) were
on a given day, and that these KPI’s meant Vodafone was heavily
sales-driven.
‘We had to be honest about where the sales-service
balance was so we could manage it,’ he explains. ‘We
decided that it was 60:40 and so had to get the balance of our KPIs
in this ratio. If we didn’t we would be kidding ourselves
that we’d get the balance right over a month or a quarter.’
This prompted Vodafone to introduce a weekly Top
10 priorities list for stores, which are monitored monthly to ensure
they adhere to the desired sales-service ratio. For each priority
stores are ranked red, amber or green, to provide clarity for both
management and store staff of their priorities that week.
‘It provides a very clear focus and helps
us to avoid things that don’t need to be measured,’
says Darby.
With the priorities lists in place, Darby says,
it is imperative they are effectively communicated to Vodafone’s
sales people in stores.
A key component of the strategy is Vodafone’s
annual conference in March, supplemented by roadshows across the
UK. Darby says that despite the fact they involve two-hour events
held in the evenings, they attract average attendances of 89% of
local staff.
Stores also receive ‘key communications’
each day, related to the Top 10 and delivered using Vodafone’s
own technology.
‘Mobiles are terrific ways of reinforcing
and delivering a message. A quick photo taken by a camera phone
can deliver a message for changing part of a store layout. Speed
is the key to us,’ says Darby.
Store managers also receive additional communications
giving them information of a broader nature; for example: ‘What’s
Hot, What’s Not’, ‘Ask Martin’, ‘Mood
of the Nation’, and ‘Listening Groups’. Although
‘Mood of the Nation’ is not related to KPIs, it is used
to assess how Vodafone staff are feeling about issues like sales
and motivation, and provides the basis for month-by-month comparisons
of employees’ attitudes.
With these platforms and initiatives in place,
the element that links them together is the staff incentives package.
Darby is quick to point out that these incentives are non-monetary
and as such are entirely separate from employees’ salaries,
including commissions.
He says that the ultimate objective of Vodafone’s
strategy was to increase sales and service levels. But it was also
to reduce the variable salary bill, i.e. commissions, ‘which
means, how do we fill the gap? And using incentives was the answer.’
Vodafone runs one major incentive from April to
June plus weekly and monthly prizes, the first being ‘Party
in Paradise’, funded by Nokia, which offered a main prize
of a holiday in Thailand.
Darby maintains that supplier-funded contributions
‘do not change the agenda of Vodafone’, and that for
Nokia the greater knowledge gained about its products by Vodafone
staff during the incentive made its involvement sufficiently worthwhile.
‘The key thing is that over the past year
our service levels have improved and it has cost a lot less to deliver
than paying people a lot more commission. It enables us to reinforce
and clarify a message,’ says Darby.
Vodafone
-
60:40 sales-service target achieved
-
‘Double digit’ growth over Christmas
-
Staff attrition lower than retail average
-
89% attendance at staff roadshows
Anthony Smith, Orange Retail head of store operations
Orange’s direct retail arm has found that improved levels
of customer service have led to increased sales as it has made its
transition from a sales-driven business to a service-led operation.
The most visible element of this shift of focus
was the company’s £9m ‘Learn’ ad campaign
in 2003, which was aimed at changing consumers’ perception
of mobiles and worked on the basis that 80% of people used only
10% of their handsets. In this campaign store staff were portrayed
as ‘trainers’ rather than sales people.
‘This led to a major change in the way we
operate, from shifting boxes to delivering service,’ explains
Smith. ‘This move from a sales culture to a service culture
was hard work; we changed our rewards payments, method of recruitment
and the way we measured service.’
Some of the easier aspects involved changing the
roles of sales people by introducing new uniforms and changing the
way training was conducted. The latter involved setting up a bi-annual
Orange Training Academy that is fully funded by manufacturers, and
also imparting greater product knowledge to new recruits through
week-long training programmes. Changes to staff recruitment involved
broadening out the search from sales people within the mobile and
electrical goods sectors into other areas.
Not surprisingly, the most difficult aspect to
change was staff payments, from a per-phone-sold basis to one also
addressing commissions for service. Smith says: ‘Rewards had
to be linked to service scores so we had to measure how service
was being delivered.’
Orange decided on a video mystery shopper programme
involving a visit being made with a covert camera to each Orange
store every quarter. ‘There is no better tool than video to
find weaknesses,’ adds Smith.
Based on such visits, stores are given scores out
of 100 and staff commissions for the quarter are then based on a
sliding scale: scores of 95-100 ensure that all store employees
receive 10% commission in that quarter, while scores under 20 mean
2% commissions.
Smith says that by hitting employees’ pockets
with reduced commissions, rather than keep the previous company-wide
fixed rate of 6%, it is hoped that poor performers will try to sell
more units to make up any shortfalls – and store staff will
work together to improve service levels in their store.
Initial results proved disappointing, partly because
the rest of Orange’s business continued to focus solely on
price. However, Smith says the retail division had to ‘hold
its nerve’ as it sought to build relationships with customers.
One early positive sign was the 20% increase in footfall as the
number of service questions from customers grew, driven by the launch
of the ‘How to…’ initiative, which included showing
people how to use SMS.
Shortly afterwards the full effects of Orange’s
new service-led culture started to feed through and conversion rates
(from customer interactions into sales) increased from 21% to 25%.
Orange’s average store customer service score has subsequently
risen from an initial 53 to 78 (a commission rate of 7%), and a
5% drop in staff turnover has led to falling costs too.
‘It’s a fact that service leads to
sales,’ claims Smith, revealing that since the shift in focus,
average transaction values have increased 18% and turnover has risen
37% year-on-year.
Orange
-
-
-
-
Conversion rates up to 25%
-
Average commissions up to 7%
-
Average transaction values up 18%
What Vodafone and Orange have done
-
Advertising focusing on customer service, not sales
-
Regular internal communications to staff and managers via
email or mobile
-
-
Bi-annual training academies, week-long training for new
staff
-
Annual conference plus two-hour roadshows for staff
-
Recruitment from non-mobile/electrical retail sectors
-
Three-month staff incentive schemes
-
Quarterly mystery shopping with results affecting staff
commissions
Every little helps
Feb 14, 2005
Everything Tesco touches at the moment seems to
turn rapidly into sales – it now accounts for £1 of
every £8 spent on the UK high street. Its Tesco Mobile MVNO
offer is no exception as it continues to carve out a position in
a market that it only entered just over 12 months ago.
Evidence of the retail giant’s efforts to
grow this part of its non-food business was the announcement that
Christmas Day saw Tesco Mobile connect its 500,000th customer, giving
a clear signal that the company continues to win market share from
more established rivals despite increasing competition in the mobile
market.
Although Andy Dewhurst, chief executive of Tesco
Telecoms, won’t reveal any further numbers or discuss levels
of profitability at Tesco Mobile, it is clearly enjoying sufficiently
healthy sales per square foot to warrant giving the category a decent
chunk of store space and an online presence on Tesco.com.
Handling handsets
This in-store presence underwent an overhaul in August when Tesco
increased the space given over to handsets and modernised the fixtures.
In a typical large Tesco store, the mobile offer now comprises four
4ft ‘modules’ that hold around 40 different handsets.
Dewhurst says this space could be increased further
if required in the future: ‘If we need more space then we’ll
give [Tesco Mobile] more space. We’ll listen to our customers
and adapt. Mobile will be a popular part of our stores for the foreseeable
future.’
The new fixtures also provide Tesco with a new
self-service method of selling. Customers are now required to take
a DVD case featuring the desired handset to the checkout, where
it is scanned and the handset handed over. This enables shelf space
to be used more effectively and for a broader mix of handsets to
be displayed.
The in-store mobile selling space is split 50:50
between Tesco’s own mobile range and various handsets and
tariffs from each of the major networks, including its joint venture
partner O2 and even rival MVNO Virgin Mobile. Dewhurst says this
ratio is likely to stay the same because Tesco wants to offer customers
a broad choice of products.
He denies any intention of squeezing out any other
networks in favour of solely offering the Tesco Mobile handset range.
He says: ‘Part of our strategy is to give customers choice
so that we are a destination store for phones. We’ve not set
out to grow our [Tesco Mobile] business at the expense of the other
brands.’
According to Dewhurst, the success of Tesco’s
MVNO is based on its arrangement with O2, which follows a similar
business model to that employed in 1997 with Tesco Personal Finance
(TPF), through a partnership with Bank of Scotland that split the
revenues straight down the middle.
The Tesco Mobile and O2 arrangement combines the
network and telephony know-how of the operator with Tesco’s
customer understanding, marketing clout and substantial footfall.
Indicative of the serious way Tesco has structured the deal is that
Tesco Mobile has its own board of directors comprising both Tesco
and O2 personnel, including O2 UK’s CEO Matthew Key as chairman,
which meets every four weeks.
Dewhurst suggests that Sainsbury’s didn’t
have the same structure Tesco has put in place when it tried to
launch its own now-aborted mobile service. It argues that other
players looking to enter the market might also fail to reach their
own 50:50 agreements, which could also give them problems.
‘We’ve done it in a serious and committed
way from our learning from TPF,’ explains Dewhurst. ‘In
the mobile industry joint ventures don’t always work and you’ve
got to pick your partner carefully.’
Dewhurst brushes aside the potential threat of newcomers, like easyMobile
and possibly Asda, entering the MVNO market: ‘We’ll
have to see how it pans out. EasyMobile is reputed to be launching
but it’s not the simplest thing to do. We’ve worked
hard and if they think it is easy, it’s not.’
EasyMobile’s intention to market itself in
the online Sim-only market would position it against Tesco Mobile’s
own Sim-only offer, run both online and off. Although the Sim-only
offer has been available since the launch of Tesco Mobile, Dewhurst
says it is becoming ‘increasingly popular’ with customers;
evidence, he claims, that they are ‘buying into’ Tesco’s
tariff.
While Dewhurst will not provide numbers for Sim
card sales, he does confirm that they are currently on trial in
a small number of Tesco Express convenience stores as well as online.
A decision on rolling out the offer to Tesco’s entire portfolio
of smaller stores will be made later this year.
Contract conundrum
Another decision Dewhurst will be making this year is when to press
the ‘go’ button on the launch of a Tesco Mobile contract
offer. This has long been mooted and, although he is not willing
to reveal a launch date, he suggests that over the next two years
Tesco’s mobile offer will broaden out (as was the case with
TPF) to include a contract proposition.
However, Dewhurst says that for the time being
prepay is sufficiently attractive to Tesco’s customers: ‘It
is wrong to say that prepay is not important – it is still
two-thirds of the market. But some people who come into our stores
are on contract, and they would be interested in a tariff from Tesco
that earns Clubcard points.’
Clubcard points will prove a powerful tool when
Tesco does decide to launch mobile contracts, because the provision
of loyalty points whenever prepay customers top-up their phones
in a Tesco store has enabled it to build a database of the heaviest
Tesco Mobile phone users. Since it is likely that some of these
customers would be better suited to contract agreements, they would
be prime targets for Tesco to migrate away from prepay onto contract.
Like every other operator in the industry, Tesco
acknowledges the importance of customer loyalty, and it is in the
particularly strong position of having one of the most successful
retail loyalty schemes on which to build its mobile operation in
the future.
‘Loyalty is the key in this business, and
to the profitability of phone companies,’ says Dewhurst. ‘If
you look after your customers and give them a good deal then you’ll
keep them. We think we’ve got this, and Clubcard helps.’
When contract does eventually launch, a crucial
component will be a simple tariff; this is the basis on which Tesco
seeks to differentiate itself from its competition in all non-food
categories that it enters.
‘Our customers love simplicity and value.
With telecoms we believe we have an offer that they can understand
and is value for money. It’s about simplicity, convenience
and value,’ says Dewhurst.
Although Tesco does not typically use marketing
or advertising for its mobile business, in line with the policy
at its other Retail Services businesses including Tesco.com and
TPF, Tesco Mobile did undertake a rare TV advertising campaign before
Christmas. Dewhurst claims that the move was essential in order
to give the Tesco Mobile proposition sufficient ‘credibility’
in the mobile market at that important time of the year.
Marketing
‘Our marketing is what I call lean, as Tesco Services businesses
do well and we don’t have to spend multimillions of pounds
on TV ads to create a brand,’ he says. ‘We do need to
promote as it helps to reinforce the message, but this is predominantly
done in-store and through Tesco.com.’
The Tesco.com online operation is an integral part
of the mobile business, as the channel lends itself well to selling
prepay connections. Dewhurst claims that online mobile sales represent
a larger proportion of total Tesco Mobile sales than online food
sales as a proportion of Tesco’s total food sales.
However, before Tesco Mobile’s MVNO rivals
start thinking that Dewhurst will be happy to concentrate on online
sales over retail, he has a warning for them. He argues that sales
of mobile handsets can still grow both in stores and on Tesco.com,
based on one simple assumption: ‘There is [still] no sign
that mobile phones are on the way out’.
The range
Tesco Mobile currently has a sale on its handsets with prices ranging
from £29.97 (Sendo S325) to £129.97 (Motorola V600 and
V80).
Handsets:
-
Nokia 2650, 1100, 3410 (online only), 3100, 3200, 6100,
3220, 6610i
-
-
Motorola C155, V180, V220, V600, V80 (online only)
-
-
Sim packs
- Single £4.97 (£4.47 online)/dual £7.94
Tesco Mobile’s tariff
-
-
Text: 10p per message (20p international)
-
-
-
Wap over GPRS: Free until 28/02, £4/MB from 1/03
-
50% off calls/texts to three pre-registered ‘favourite
numbers’.
60 Second Interview
On Phones and Bills
Ten years ago you had one phone in the corner of the room but now
there’s broadband and all your kids have mobiles. When you
add this bill up it could come to £1,000 per year, which isa
really serious bill.
On Supermarket sales
Customers are now very savvy and self-service is increasingly popular.
Customers are very keen for the freedom of choice and to not be
sold to.
On Tesco’s Loyalty Card
Part of our [mobile] offer is Clubcard points, and the card scheme
is the cement that goes through the whole of the Tesco business.
On Building a Brand
When Egg launched its credit card it spent £30m per year on
advertising. We can be more efficient with that spend and can put
it into offering a better deal.
Crossing the channel
Jan 31, 2005
The success of Charles Dunstone’s massive
Carphone Warehouse chain has arguably put more independent mobile
dealers out of business than any other single factor; nonetheless,
he’s widely respected by those still selling phones, from
one-man bands to his high street rivals. Now Carphone is preparing
to make a serious bid for the distribution market.
There’s nothing new in the UK’s number
one mobile retailer having bold plans. The business has constantly
sought new opportunities to make its scale work for it. Carphone
has 600 UK stores, a significant web presence, a telecoms business
and a list of services for both operators and consumers that are
the envy of its rivals – and that’s just in the UK.
Now the retailer wants to be the mobile dealers’ best friend
and take a chunk of the distribution market too.
The idea of a company playing both retailer and
distributor might be an anathema in some industries, but it’s
something that is very familiar to the mobile industry, most famously
in the form of the Caudwell Group.
Pump up the volume
The industry is full of dealers that complain about how hard it
is to compete with Phones 4u on the high street, but in their next
breath pick up the phone to call sister company 20:20 Logistics
to buy a box of handsets.
‘I don’t know why anyone would do that,’
complains one distribution rival, but the prices and availability
that the Caudwell Group can offer are compelling arguments.
The Caudwell Group is not alone in having its own
retail interests alongside distribution. Fone Logistics, Mainline
and Avenir, to name just three, also have retail outlets, but none
of them are large chains. Now Carphone wants to make a play for
distribution. If John Caudwell can make it work, the reasoning goes,
then Charles Dunstone is also in with a shot.
Carphone, with its established relationships with
both operators and manufacturers, is well placed to make an impact
in distribution. Operator and manufacturer volume bonuses –
the key to profits in a cut-throat market – can only benefit
from the opportunity to pump up the volume that comes from an even
broader channel.
Carphone’s efforts to date through Mobile
Phone Express have made little impact on the market. The Sim-free
distributor has a relatively low profile and often features products
with a trade price that is left in the shade by the retail price
available to any consumer, or dealer, at a Carphone on the high
street, say dealers. But Carphone Distribution, for want of a better
name, could be as well equipped as 20:20 to offer fiercely-priced
handsets and airtime should it wish.
Will it want to get into a price war with the mighty
Caudwell Group? John Caudwell still has more than enough loose change
left from his sale of Singlepoint to ensure that he can meet tough
commercial challenges.
A senior retailer, whose chain is already attached
to a large distributor, says the introduction of another potential
heavyweight could be beneficial to the market as a whole: ‘I
think it might help the market rather than swallow it up, because
at the moment 20:20 dominates. It will spread the cake a little
more evenly and will put serious pressure on the Caudwell Group.’
However, others fear that any price war is more
likely to produce casualties from smaller rivals.
While Carphone obviously has a handle on the operators
and manufacturers, the company will need to move quickly to establish
a dealer base. Carphone’s UK MD, Andrew Harrison, is acutely
aware that whatever dealers may say about customer service, price
remains paramount.
But there may be obstacles along the way. One distribution
rival claims that a previous foray into the distribution market
– Carphone’s efforts to build TalkTalk sales through
independent channels – came unstuck because of dealer fears
that the TalkTalk subscriber details might give Carphone access
to their customers. This could put a brake on Carphone’s expansion
into mobile airtime distribution.
Buy me!
Similar fears will have to be allayed and ‘Chinese walls’
put in place if Carphone is to make retailers, who are often fighting
a losing battle with the giant on the high street, comfortable with
using the company for distribution. But dealers may find the idea
of buying from a retail rival sweetened by the prospect of a killer
deal.
One dealer Mobile spoke to captured the dealers’
dilemma: ‘It would be like buying from the enemy camp –
but with their buying power they will able to put together incredible
deals. They’re our enemy on the high street with their volume
bonuses and pricing, but you’ve got to admire what Dunstone
has done.’
Carphone is considering acquiring an existing distributor
to speed up its retail customer acquisition and has looked at European
Telecom and, it is widely believed, Fone Logistics. Unique, with
its established business supplying Woolworths and strong relationships
with a range of businesses, is also thought to be a possible target.
However, Carphone won’t want to pay a premium and may well
baulk at the prices asked by many UK distributors.
Carphone won’t be the first to have quibbled
with the price that some in the industry would like to command for
their business.
Buying an existing distributor would marry an established customer
base and distribution knowledge with Carphone’s colossal buying
power, so is likely to remain on the agenda if the right business
can be found at the right price.
Non-specialist forces
Local dealers and small chains are only part of the equation. It’s
the supermarkets and general retailers that the big distributors
are fighting over. Already a supplier to Sainsbury’s, Carphone
is about to join the wider battle.
With Woolworths, Argos, Boots, Comet and Tesco
accounting for a massive proportion of non-contract sales, the frontline
for prepay is now found nestling between boxes of cereal and DVDs.
In fact, in Carphone’s bid to establish itself as a serious
player in distribution, supplying the axis of non-specialist retail
could be as much about defending itself from their encroachment
on its established market. If the forces of general retailing are
going to take a chunk of your business anyway, you might as well
make some money from supplying them.
Unique has made a good business out of supplying
Woolworths, while 20:20 serves the retailer of the moment, Tesco.
Recently Unique and Dextra tussled over another high street prize,
Boots, with Dextra coming out on top. There are a limited number
of these big contracts going and Carphone is going to have to fight
for them. As the head of a retail chain who declined to be named
says: ‘The retail market is changing so Carphone will want
to move with those changes and cover those avenues.’
Public pressures
Carphone has managed to stay a step ahead of its rivals though a
constant process of breaking into new markets. From customer management
for O2 and Vodafone, through MVNO Fresh, to its enormous insurance
business and TalkTalk telecoms business, Carphone is always on the
lookout for new opportunities.
Carphone has more reason to do so than most. As
a publicly-listed company, it is under constant pressure to demonstrate
growth. It has consistently been able to grow its business, even
being able to cope with the impact of pulling out of the low-yield
but high-revenue inter-community handset trading business in the
wake of Customs’ ‘joint and several liability’
provisions in 2003.
Distribution can make excellent use of Carphone’s
existing assets. The question is less ‘why move into full-scale
distribution?’ and more ‘why not?’.
The appointment of Steve Fraser as director of
indirect distribution is the most recent and overt sign of Carphone’s
ambitions. Fraser, a veteran of two operators, won’t be drawn
on specifics, but says his job is to ‘explore all the options’.
He says: ‘I started the distribution at One
2 One and 3. Now we’re starting from scratch.’ Since
leaving 3, Fraser says he has had several options, ‘but joining
Carphone wasn’t a hard decision to make.’
The numbers that add up
Mar 3, 2004
Brian McBride didn’t exactly have an easy
job when he came in as chief exec of T-Mobile UK. The operator’s
name was mud in the financial press thanks to its bitter spat with
Virgin Mobile, and after a resounding defeat in the courts it stood
to lose the MVNO’s business – and even its share holding
– unless a peace deal could be worked out. It was McBride’s
first job to pour oil on troubled waters.
Now things are looking altogether different. A
truce was formally announced last month – and not just a temporary
lull in hostilities, but a 10-year agreement to work together. It
leaves McBride free to enjoy the job he started 10 months ago after
leaving Dell.
New results for the business – due next week
– should make that task easier. They are likely to show T-Mobile
UK driving ahead. Revenues are thought to have increased by around
20% a year, but the bottom is set to leap up by around 30% –
a sure sign the business is getting into top gear.
Strong performance
With everyone keen to forget about the previous management team,
it would be easy for McBride to take the praise: ‘Last year
will turn out to have been a fabulous year financially for T-Mobile
UK. But I would only feel entitled to take a small part of the credit.
The stronger performance was due to things that the company have
been doing for two or three years.’
Some of those things were at national level: in
the UK, distribution was rationalised and brought together on a
single campus. Others were dictated at group level, like centralising
purchasing power to aggregate the operator’s clout over all
its territories.
That’s not to say McBride has not made changes.
In the computer industry, he was dubbed ‘Frugal McDougal’
for his rigorously commercial style. He is evidently bringing the
same approach to bear at T-Mobile.
‘When I came in 10 months ago, there was
a feeling almost of driving growth at any costs. Unit market share
was the big measurement. What we’ve done over the past six
months is really make sure that the goals for T-Mobile UK are fully
aligned with the goals of the group as a whole.
‘We’ve pulled back. I would say that
we have been probably one of the less aggressive players in the
market with the channels over the past couple of quarters, and yet
our growth has reflected the fact that our propositions are still
what the customer wants.’
Fastest-growing operator
Remarkably, in Q4 last year T-Mobile was still the fastest-growing
operator ahead of Virgin Mobile. The two combined claimed more new
business than all the other operators put together. That meant that
one way or another, 50% of all new customers ended up on the T-Mobile
network.
Of course there are lies, damn lies and network
subscriber figures. These numbers mask the fact that McBride still
has a problem with the mix of his business.
‘If I look at ARPU by customer I’m
number one in pre-pay. My contract ARPU is second out of four. The
problem is when you blend them together. I’ve got far more
pre-pay than post-pay customers to blend. My blended ARPU is the
lowest of the four.’
McBride’s challenge, then, is to hang on
to his high-value pre-pay customers and add more contract customers.
‘We’ll continue to focus on the bottom
line. We’ll continue to make sure that we’re bringing
in the right customers. We’ll continue to manage churn, but
we’re not going to give a free handset to every single person
who’s got a contract. There will be some people who phone
up for a new handset and we’ll say, here’s the price.’
McBride is taking the same tough line with his
sales channels. Over the last six months, he has controversially
changed commission structures. On the plus side, the confused scheme
to share a slice of ongoing revenues was dropped. But there was
also a determination to remove bonuses from ineffective customers.
‘I met all of the channels shortly after
I took over and they were a little bit annoyed at the changes in
commission. When we reset the commissions with the channels we were
consciously trying to incentivise them to bring us customers at
the higher end of the spectrum, and that’s worked its way
through in terms of the ARPU growth and the revenue growth we’ve
enjoyed.’
This restructuring of commissions was accompanied
by a tidying up of tariffs: ‘Some old tariffs gave us lots
of volume but quite frankly in terms of adding to the bottom line
were fairly insignificant. We’ve really discouraged a lot
of that. There are fewer tariffs out there today, they’re
easier to understand and they clearly do relate to certain types
of customers.’
One of the concerns when McBride came in was that
he would turn T-Mobile into another Dell, with a big shift to direct
distribution. Anxieties would hardly have been allayed when he brought
in Gordon Valentine, the man who set up Dell.com, to revamp T-Mobile’s
web sales operation.
After a quick fix, turning monthly sales from hundreds
to thousands, Valentine is working on a grander strategic plan.
O2 has attracted a million customers through the Internet, and McBride’s
hope is to emulate it.
Web sales
‘I don’t want to be the Dell of the mobile phone industry.
It’s difficult even to project what percentage of our business
it could be. Web and telesales could probably get to be 20% of my
business, were they successful. [But even] if I succeed with my
web plans I’ll still be doing less on the web as a percentage
than O2, and probably Vodafone and Orange. The channels have got
less to worry about from my web business than they have with the
other guys in the industry.’
McBride is also set to approve modest expansion
of T-Mobile’s own stores. There will be another 30 stores
this year, and a further 50 next, taking his total to 200.
‘I’ve never been in retail in my life,
so I spent some months trying to get my head around what the shops
could do before I tried to get involved in any big decisions about
their role. I’m now absolutely convinced that there is an
important long-term place for them in our business.’
It’s the usual arguments of customer support
and marketing that have won the day. In the South East, these roles
are being carried out by T-Mobile’s ‘front three’
indies – Ace Contact, Chitter Chatter and Fonehouse. But further
north McBride feels under-represented and sees own-brand stores
as the way to fill the gap.
Retail presence
Again, McBride says T-Mobile is only catching up with the big retail
presence of its rivals: ‘I still see [mobile] as being very
much multi-channel. We’re not going to go all direct or all
in shops or all, you know, off the page. Five years out, the big
guys in the high street will still be very important to me.’
But what about the smaller independents with whom
T-Mobile trades now? ‘The independents and the smaller players
will be important, but I think they’ll be less of those around.
We want to deal with less of them.’
It would be unfair to claim that McBride is contemplating
a crude cull. However, he is clearly going to continually sift his
dealer base to remove lacklustre retailers.
‘I review their performance every month and
I’m looking at the number of connections they’re giving
us,’ he says. ‘I’m also looking at things that
never pay. I’m looking at their own payment behaviour, so
there’s a real quality threshold to be applying to these guys
now.
‘Hopefully, they’ll do very well by
being a partner of ours. But it doesn’t come for nothing.’
In the heat of the market
Jul 15, 2004
Free texts, free weekend calls, free top-of-the-range
handsets… the market is certainly a free-for-all at the moment,
as the established networks battle to hold their ground against
aggressors such as 3 and BT Mobile. And it looks like there will
be more to come as Tesco and Virgin both gear up to launch contract
deals.
This is great for customers – as well as
retailers and dealers, who are all currently enjoying something
of a commission bonanza – but it’s not so good for the
networks that are footing the bill for this giveaway frenzy.
Not surprisingly, questions are being asked about
whether their aggressive drives to acquire and retain customers
at a high cost is sustainable.
Revenue growth
Tony Shiret, an analyst at investment bank Credit Suisse First Boston
(CSFB), thinks not. He reckons this is a market that should instead
be focused on updates for its revenue growth rather than spending
large sums to attract new customers from rival networks.
When this is combined with the regulator’s
decision to reduce interconnect fees, thereby making less cash available
for customer acquisition, Shiret says: ‘Subscriber acquisition
costs are being boosted by the networks and this isn’t sustainable.
The operators’ models are questionable.’
However, they are all doing it and the prime motivator
behind this activity is the acquisitive stance of 3.
Ian Driver, general manager of independent channels
and channel support at O2, agrees that the current climate is unsustainable:
‘You have to question what 3 is doing. We’ve got a big
base of customers so we do not need to keep them at any cost.’
Vodafone takes a similar stance. Consumer segment
director Richard Daly says: ‘We don’t think it’s
helpful for anyone to get into a game of overpaying. Effectively
being asked to pay a year’s worth of revenue for a new customer
who is almost certainly going to be a serial churner doesn’t
make economic sense for anybody. I can’t put more and more
in to protect share, it’s crazy.’
Despite these comments, one City analyst, who does
not wish to be named, suggests that Vodafone has ‘been compelled
at times to match 3’, especially when it involves high-spending
customers threatening to switch networks.
‘The operators will say they are offering
a better service so they can maintain their pricing points, but
I hear Vodafone is matching some deals,’ he says.
O2 has also looked to retain its more valuable
customers with increasingly competitive offers. In addition, the
introduction of a two-year contract further highlights how seriously
it is taking the threat from 3.
However, the analyst claims that the other networks
are generally willing to let 3 chip away at their market shares
while it still has a low subscriber base rather than let it completely
‘do their margins in’ by joining it in offering chunky
handset subsidies and generous commissions.
‘The effect to the other operators’
top lines is pretty negligible, and there hasn’t been a seismic
shift to high customer acquisition costs for them.’
He suggests that much of the talk about a ‘crazy’
market from the networks is down to straightforward and sensible
bluster to protect their subscriber real estate. Although, he adds,
should 3 get to 15% market share in five years’ time, it would
be a very different matter.
According to Peter Green, MD of Phones 4u, the
market will probably remain ultra competitive until then. He suggests
that 3 and BT Mobile’s predatory view of high-spending customers,
and the likes of T-Mobile, O2 and Orange desperately protecting
their existing base, make it inevitable that the market will remain
ferociously competitive.
Wider choice
Green believes that 3 will really start to grow its business when
it can offer more handset choice, the result being that Vodafone
and O2 will have to continue to compete to retain their market share.
3 certainly recognises that it has rocked the boat
and seems to be revelling in its maverick stance. A spokesman for
the company says: ‘These guys are shaken. The market was comfortable,
and the likes of Vodafone were making a lot of money. Now 3 has
upset the other operators as it is challenging them. 3 is already
a serious threat, otherwise why are they now squeaking?’
He argued that 3’s acquisition model was
sustainable, despite the accusations from its rivals about its high
customer acquisition costs.
The City analyst calculated that it costs 3 between
£350 and £400 to add a new subscriber. For a company
such as O2, it amounts to much less – nearer £160.
While not disputing these numbers, the 3 spokesman
suggested that the average 20% churn rate of the other networks
means they have to acquire many thousands of customers just to stand
still. So the average price they effectively pay for each new customer
that grows its market share is very high.
‘For O2, two million new subscribers is a
standstill element, but because 3 is a new business there is very
little churn and each new customer is new business and new revenue,’
he argues.
However, this argument is unlikely to hold for
more than 12 months – when 3 will begin to suffer from similar
churn rates to its rivals.
Green predicts that it could take 3 three to four
years to reach the point where it has a base of around 10 million
subscribers and can compete squarely with the other networks. It
will have some difficult decisions to make about its customer acquisition
costs when churn starts to really kick in. Until this point, customers
will continue to be the winners in a competitive market.
‘Currently the market is over-heated,’
he says. ‘There is always an upside if the market is after
incremental volume, and the customer is ultimately the major beneficiary.’
Shiret agrees, but suggests that retailers such
as Phones 4u and The Carphone Warehouse are also enjoying the high
levels of commission coming in their direction – although
they are sensibly reluctant to admit as much. But while this is
good news, there is a potential downside: when the market does eventually
cool, retailers and dealers could be in for a hangover if the networks
pull their horns in.
Healthy?
Driver does not believe there will be any adverse affects: ‘The
retailers that are here now are the good ones. Those with an allegiance
to 3 are simply making more money now, but when they withdraw, these
retailers will just return to being in a healthy position rather
than one that is making them as rich as now.’
However, the dealers are definitely starting to
feel a downside – as the networks seek to push more business
down their direct channels in an attempt to limit commission payments
to their indirect partners. Vodafone is currently re-jigging its
business model in such a way.
‘We understand where our economic threshold
is with our indirect partners,’ says Daly. ‘There’s
been a shift of emphasis… and the swing to direct has been
driven by the market.’
As a result, the company has sought to grow both
its online and high street operations. This increased focus on the
high street has not gone unnoticed by Christian Maher, telecoms
analyst at Investec, who says gross connections from the networks’
own stores is on the increase. He cites both O2 and Vodafone as
companies whose focus on own-brand stores is ‘making a material
difference’ to their performance.
As well as increasing their portfolios of outlets,
some networks have also benefited from the introduction of better
retailing and merchandising skills and a move towards operating
larger premises. Driver agrees, and acknowledges that stores are
certainly part of the gameplan at O2.
‘We believe that there are still opportunities
to take advantage of gaps [in our stores coverage], although we
are not in major acquisition mode,’ he says.
As a result of such action, Maher believes there
will be a continuation in the ‘fallout of some smaller stores’.
However, he adds that many small independent operators
are still flourishing and will continue to do so in the future.
According to Green, customers will always value
an independent shop over a network store because they ‘will
never get away from being a proprietary offering’.
He suggests that building a chain of network-owned
stores was a ‘potentially short-sighted’ strategy that
would leave O2 with a significant fixed cost that would be difficult
to reverse out of when the climate changed and the focus was less
on growing direct business.
However, this climate change could be some time
away, judging by the aggressive actions of 3 and BT Mobile and the
imminent moves by Tesco and Virgin.
So despite the suggestions that this over-heated
market is unsustainable, it looks unlikely that we shall see it
cooling down for some time to come.
|